San Francisco Skyline
BILL OF RIGHTS-- First Amendment - Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.-- Second Amendment -A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed-- Third Amendment - No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law-- Fourth Amendment - The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.-- Fifth Amendment - No person shall be held to answer for any capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.--Sixth Amendment - In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district where in the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.-- Seventh Amendment - In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re examined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law-- Eighth Amendment - Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted-- Ninth Amendment - The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people--Tenth Amendment - The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people--.
Taking the Fifth-A Criminal Law Blog
RSS icon Email icon Bullet (black)
  • JUST SAY NO!

    A recent Missouri case reported in Fourth Amendment.com State v. Allen illustrates the need not to let police into your house or your car or anywhere else that you have an expectation of privacy. The police conducted a “knock and talk” at the residence of Amy Jo Dean Rig. A “knock and talk” occurs when the police believe that criminal activity, in this case drug use and sales, is occurring in a residence. They do not have probable cause to search the residence or to get a search warrant. If they had probable cause they would go ahead and get the search warrant. But since they don’t have probable cause they knock on the door and attempt to either get information from the resident that gives them probable cause or even better yet get the resident to let them into the house to search for contraband.

    In this case Rig initially said “no.” But police are taught to be persuasive talk. Many department have officers who specialize in talking their way into a residence. In this case they used a female officer. Presumably they thought that the female was more likely to get into the apartment.

    The officers asked Rig if there were drugs in the apartment. She said “no.” In a not unusual move the officers told Rig to let them in to show that she was telling the truth. She continues to say, “no.” The officers start talking about Rig’s children and how bad it is to have drugs around them. Eventually they get her to admit that she has a marijuana pipe. The officers ask if they can come in and get it. They will only write her a ticket if they get the pipe. She says she’ll get it and give it to them. They say “for officer safety purposes” they want to come in and get it. At this point Rig gives up and says, “yes.” They come in. One of the officers stays in the living room with Rig’s guests. the other follows her to the bedroom. She goes to the bedside table and quickly takes the pipe out of a drawer and gives it to them.

    Now that they have evidence they wonder what else is in the drawer. Thi\ey get permission to search the drawer. They find a white powder used for cutting drugs. Well now that they have probable cause, they give Rig the choice of either giving further consent or they will get a search warrant. The cat is out of the bag and its too late. They get the consent and search the house. They find a commercial quantity of methamphetamine. Her boyfriend is arrested and convicted.

    If Rig had said “no” at the door and stuck to her guns or if she said I want to talk to a lawyer before I let you in my house, the search would not have happened and no one would have been arrested.