<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NOT VERY BRIGHT MR ROEDER</title>
	<atom:link href="http://takingthefifth-acriminallawblog.com/2009/06/08/not-very-bright-mr-roeder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://takingthefifth-acriminallawblog.com/2009/06/08/not-very-bright-mr-roeder/</link>
	<description>â€“A Criminal Law Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:37:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bray</title>
		<link>http://takingthefifth-acriminallawblog.com/2009/06/08/not-very-bright-mr-roeder/comment-page-1/#comment-86297</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 23:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://takingthefifth-acriminallawblog.com/?p=1521#comment-86297</guid>
		<description>Happened upon the site while researching the U.S. Code and disparate sentences incurred by anti-abortionists when compared to good-faith, genuine terrorists (of the Islamic variety in consideration of current events) or property destroying, earth-worshiping tree-huggers are compared.

Is this all the author can say about the good deed of Mr. Roeder?  Just a cheap slur against his intellect?  No honest assessment of the consistency of his actions with the doctrine most &quot;prolifers&quot; - and, really, the civilized world - historically speaking - proclaim?  

He acted in absolute good faith with the doctrine of the imago Dei.  Either mankind is created in the image of God and therefore inviolable as long as he is innocent of any high crime or he is as the Modernists imagines, just another glorified evolving worm, subject to the lethal whims of a mother or any other person in power.

You can&#039;t have it both ways. 

Commendations to Mr. Roeder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happened upon the site while researching the U.S. Code and disparate sentences incurred by anti-abortionists when compared to good-faith, genuine terrorists (of the Islamic variety in consideration of current events) or property destroying, earth-worshiping tree-huggers are compared.</p>
<p>Is this all the author can say about the good deed of Mr. Roeder?  Just a cheap slur against his intellect?  No honest assessment of the consistency of his actions with the doctrine most &#8220;prolifers&#8221; &#8211; and, really, the civilized world &#8211; historically speaking &#8211; proclaim?  </p>
<p>He acted in absolute good faith with the doctrine of the imago Dei.  Either mankind is created in the image of God and therefore inviolable as long as he is innocent of any high crime or he is as the Modernists imagines, just another glorified evolving worm, subject to the lethal whims of a mother or any other person in power.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t have it both ways. </p>
<p>Commendations to Mr. Roeder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

