San Francisco Skyline
BILL OF RIGHTS-- First Amendment - Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.-- Second Amendment -A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed-- Third Amendment - No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law-- Fourth Amendment - The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.-- Fifth Amendment - No person shall be held to answer for any capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.--Sixth Amendment - In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district where in the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.-- Seventh Amendment - In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re examined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law-- Eighth Amendment - Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted-- Ninth Amendment - The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people--Tenth Amendment - The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people--.
Taking the Fifth-A Criminal Law Blog
RSS icon Email icon Bullet (black)
  • CONSERVATIVES JOIN LIBERALS TO FIGHT THE OVER CRIMINALIZATION OF AMERICAN SOCIETY

    Posted on November 24th, 2009 zshapiro No comments

    Now that the government is prosecuting many business executives for criminal offenses an article in the New York Times points out that conservative leaders are joining with criminal defense attorneys and people on the left in arguing that the government has exceeded its power by using criminal laws to intrude upon the private lives of individuals. Conservatives are objecting to the excessive power used by Federal agents and courts to pursue individuals charged with criminal offenses.

    Conservatives such as Reagan attorneys general Edwin Meese III and DickThornburg now find themselves working with organizations such as the American Civil Liberties Union to oppose the over criminalization of American society.Meese has criticized the astounding number and vagueness of federal criminal laws. Conservatives have pointed out that there are over 4400 Federal criminal crimes criminalizing such activities as making a false weather report or importing lobsters.

    Experts in the field point to conservative justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas who have joined with more moderate justices in decisions limiting the ability of the government to use evidence at trial when the evidence is not subject to critical cross examination.

    Conservatives find themselves particularly in opposition to criminal laws that allow for the seizure of private property used in criminal activity. Religious groups attack laws that prevent rehabilitation of criminals. Many conservatives are worried about the enormous cost of maintaining the world’s largest prison system.

    Leave a Reply