San Francisco Skyline
BILL OF RIGHTS-- First Amendment - Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.-- Second Amendment -A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed-- Third Amendment - No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law-- Fourth Amendment - The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.-- Fifth Amendment - No person shall be held to answer for any capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.--Sixth Amendment - In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district where in the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.-- Seventh Amendment - In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re examined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law-- Eighth Amendment - Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted-- Ninth Amendment - The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people--Tenth Amendment - The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people--.
Taking the Fifth-A Criminal Law Blog
RSS icon Email icon Bullet (black)
  • NINTH CIRCUIT RULES THAT IDAHO PARDON COUNTS TOWARDS FEDERAL GUIDELINES CRIMINAL HISTORY DETERMINATION

    Posted on December 18th, 2009 zshapiro No comments

    The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled yesterday that an Idaho conviction for which the defendant received a pardon under Idaho law remains a prior conviction for the purpose of the Sentencing Guidelines.

    Clinton DeWitt Bays, Jr. pleaded guilty to a charges of being a drug user in possession of a firearm and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine. He was sentenced to 78 months in the Federal Penitentiary and he appealed claiming that the District Court judge wrongly considered 1992 convictions in Idaho for two counts of vehicular manslaughter and one count of aggravated driving under the influence. The state charges were pardoned in 2007 by State of Idaho Commission of Pardons and Parole. The pardon restored “all civil, political, and other rights enjoyed prior to the commission of the crime.”

    Section 4A1.2(j) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines
    . . . states that sentences for expunged convictions are not included when determining a defendant’s criminal history category. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4A1.2(j) (2008). Application Note 10 to section 4A1.2 states, however, that previous convictions which are “set aside or . . . pardoned for reasons unrelated to innocence or errors of law” are to be counted. Id. § 4A1.2 cmt.
    n.10.

    The Ninth Circuit ruled that the Idaho pardon was not an expungement for the purpose of the Guidelines because it was not a complete removal from Bays’ criminal record. Nor was it necessarily unrelated to innocence or errors of law. Rather it was given in order to restore his civil rights and to remove the stigma associated with a conviction. As such it is not an expungement under the Guideline and it can be used to determine Bays’ criminal history. In fact Idaho has a separate expungement statute which allows a defendent to petition the court for an expungement that vacates the conviction and it becomes a nullity. While this statute was not before the Ninth Circuit it is likely that an expunged conviction under this statute would not count in determining a criminal history score.

    The one thing that is certain is that each state has different pardoning and expungement statutes. Each pardon statute and each expungement statute must be considered separately to determine whether it is exempt from the criminal history score granted as part of a guidelines determination.

    Leave a Reply