San Francisco Skyline
BILL OF RIGHTS-- First Amendment - Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.-- Second Amendment -A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed-- Third Amendment - No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law-- Fourth Amendment - The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.-- Fifth Amendment - No person shall be held to answer for any capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.--Sixth Amendment - In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district where in the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.-- Seventh Amendment - In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re examined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law-- Eighth Amendment - Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted-- Ninth Amendment - The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people--Tenth Amendment - The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people--.
Taking the Fifth-A Criminal Law Blog
RSS icon Email icon Bullet (black)
  • MICHAEL JACKSON’S DOCTOR CHARGED WITH VOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER

    Michael Jackson’s doctor was charged with involuntary manslaughter in Los Angeles yesterday as a result of administering propofol, a major anesthetic to Jackson, causing his death.

    Under California law voluntary manslaughter is

    the commission of an unlawful act, not amounting to felony; or in the commission of a lawful act which might produce death, in an unlawful manner, or without due caution and circumspection.

    At trial the district attorney will have to try to prove that Murray gave Jackson propofol in a manner that was grossly negligent and without due caution and circumspection. Under the criminal law negligence is not sufficient, it must be grossly negligent, and that is not going to be easy to do. As Loyola law professor Laurie Levenson said “it has to be really extreme for no good reason.” While Murray has admitted to giving Jackson propofol the dose was not necessarily excessive. Propofol is generally used to treat people in the operating room. Murray gave Jackson the normal dose. While it is normally only used in the operating room the district attorney may have trouble convincing a jury that Murray was grossly negligent where he only gave Jackson a dose that many other people have been given with no negative side effects.

    But where Murray was at least negligent, if not grossly negligent was that he administered the medication in Jackson’s home. In the hospital where propofol is normally administered equipment and personnel are present to handle any emergencies. Furthermore after administering the propofol Murray briefly left Jackson’s bedside to go to the restroom. In a hospital it would be unheard of to leave a patient unsupervised after administering a dose of propofol.