San Francisco Skyline
BILL OF RIGHTS-- First Amendment - Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.-- Second Amendment -A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed-- Third Amendment - No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law-- Fourth Amendment - The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.-- Fifth Amendment - No person shall be held to answer for any capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.--Sixth Amendment - In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district where in the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.-- Seventh Amendment - In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re examined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law-- Eighth Amendment - Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted-- Ninth Amendment - The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people--Tenth Amendment - The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people--.
Taking the Fifth-A Criminal Law Blog
RSS icon Email icon Bullet (black)
  • JUDGE CRITICIZED FOR SENTENCING LECTURE

    Posted on September 14th, 2010 zshapiro No comments

    Being a judge does not mean that you are very bright. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin Rudolph T. Randa sentenced Jose Figueroa after a drug trial in which he was found guilty of distribution of cocaine and conspiracy to sell cocaine to 235 months in prison. However it was not the sentence that causes Randa to have his IQ questioned. After all, believe it or not, 235 months was the bottom of Figueroa’s guidelines. But it is some of the things Randa said at sentencing that got him criticized by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

    Not only did the judge question Figueroa’s Mexican heritage but he questioned Figueroa’s immigration status, as well as that of his wife and three sisters. He brought up unnecessary references to Hugo Chávez, Iranian terrorists, and Adolf Hitler’s dog. He told Figueroa that he ought to be happy that he is doing time in an American jail instead of in Mexico or Turkey. He should also be glad, according to Randa, that he is not in Thailand or Malaysia where he could be sentenced to death. He claimed that American have a greater respect for the rule of law than in some other countries including Mexico.

    You guessed it. The Seventh Circuit remanded the case for resentencing with a different judge.

    Leave a Reply