San Francisco Skyline
BILL OF RIGHTS-- First Amendment - Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.-- Second Amendment -A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed-- Third Amendment - No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law-- Fourth Amendment - The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.-- Fifth Amendment - No person shall be held to answer for any capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.--Sixth Amendment - In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district where in the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.-- Seventh Amendment - In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re examined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law-- Eighth Amendment - Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted-- Ninth Amendment - The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people--Tenth Amendment - The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people--.
Taking the Fifth-A Criminal Law Blog
RSS icon Email icon Bullet (black)
  • FORMER JUDGE CIAVARELLA CONVICTED

    Posted on February 22nd, 2011 zshapiro 1 comment

    Former Luzerne County Pennsylvania Common Pleas Court Judge Mark A. Ciavarella Jr. was found guilty of racketeering, racketeering conspiracy, honest services mail fraud, money laundering conspiracy and a host of tax fraud charges in what has become known as the“Kids for Cash Scandal.” As a juvenile court judge, it was alleged that Ciavarella received money from a for profit company in exchange for sending children to the company’s private jail. Many of the children were sent to the facility for lengthy periods of time while being denied various rights guaranteed by the constitution. Often Ciavarella denied the children their right to counsel before sending them to the private jail.

    It was a mixed verdict with Ciavarella being cleared of extortion, bribery and honest services wire fraud charges. Overall he was convicted of 12 of the 39 counts, including most of the serious allegations, in the indictment. But it is not exactly clear what the jury believed. For example it convicted him of racketeering and honest services fraud but it found him not guilty of bribery. Honest services fraud is a rather complicated crime. It is defined in 18 U.S.C. ยง1346 as a “scheme or artifice to defraud includes a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services.” The Supreme Court has limited it to cases which involve a “fraudulent schemes to deprive another of honest services through bribes or kickbacks supplied by a third party who ha[s] not been deceived”. In the case of Ciavarella he received money from the private corporation to deprive the Common Pleas Court of his “honest services.”

    Racketeering is a form of conspiracy under which money is obtained illegally often by extortion. The jury found that Ciavarella illicitly obtained $997,000 in kickbacks from the builder of the PA Child Care and Western PA Child Care detention centers.

    While this trial did not concentrate upon the juveniles’ denial of constitutional rights, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court reversed 4000 juvenile convictions in Ciavarella’s court.

    Furthermore there remains a pending civil suits by thousands of juveniles 1 who appeared before Ciavarella.

    Notes:

    1. Many of the “juveniles” are now adults.
     

    One Response to “FORMER JUDGE CIAVARELLA CONVICTED”

    1. Great post… I will check back your page again for sure.

    Leave a Reply