<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Taking the Fifth &#187; Grand Jury</title>
	<atom:link href="http://takingthefifth-acriminallawblog.com/category/grand-jury/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://takingthefifth-acriminallawblog.com</link>
	<description>â€“A Criminal Law Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:52:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>U S ATTORNEY DENIED ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ROLE</title>
		<link>http://takingthefifth-acriminallawblog.com/2010/01/28/u-s-attorney-denied-absolute-immunity-for-administrative-role/</link>
		<comments>http://takingthefifth-acriminallawblog.com/2010/01/28/u-s-attorney-denied-absolute-immunity-for-administrative-role/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zshapiro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Grand Jury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immunity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://takingthefifth-acriminallawblog.com/?p=3852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lawyers for  U. S. Attorney Daniel Zachem <a href="http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2009/06/dc-circuit-revives-suit-against-prosecutor-court-official.html">filed</a> a writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court challenging a D. C. Circuit Court decision denying him immunity in a case in which Zachem and Suzanne Bailey-Jones, a District of Columbia Superior Court official removed Peter Atherton from the grand jury.  The rule allows only the presiding judge or his/her designate to remove grand jurors.  But after complaints from other members of the grand jury that Atherton was disruptive Zachem went to Bailey-Jones who removed Zachem from the grand jury.</p>
<p>The District Court  dismissed Atherton&#8217;s suits after ruling <em>inter alia</em> that Bailey-Jones and Zachem were entitled to absolute immunity.  The D. C. Circuit <a href="http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/common/opinions/200906/07-5195-1183349.pdf">ruled</a> that neither Bailey Jones or Zachem had absolute immunity.  Absolute immunity only applies to officials when they are acting in judicial or advocacy roles.  Both Bailey-Jones and Zachem were carrying out administrative duties and therefore were only entitled to limited immunity.  Therefore the Circuit Court revived Altherton&#8217;s suit at least until the Supreme Court decides on the writ of certiorari.</p>
<a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Ftakingthefifth-acriminallawblog.com%2F2010%2F01%2F28%2Fu-s-attorney-denied-absolute-immunity-for-administrative-role%2F&amp;linkname=U%20S%20ATTORNEY%20DENIED%20ABSOLUTE%20IMMUNITY%20FOR%20ADMINISTRATIVE%20ROLE">Share/Save</a>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://takingthefifth-acriminallawblog.com/2010/01/28/u-s-attorney-denied-absolute-immunity-for-administrative-role/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
