San Francisco Skyline
BILL OF RIGHTS-- First Amendment - Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.-- Second Amendment -A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed-- Third Amendment - No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law-- Fourth Amendment - The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.-- Fifth Amendment - No person shall be held to answer for any capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.--Sixth Amendment - In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district where in the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.-- Seventh Amendment - In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re examined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law-- Eighth Amendment - Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted-- Ninth Amendment - The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people--Tenth Amendment - The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people--.
Taking the Fifth-A Criminal Law Blog
RSS icon Email icon Bullet (black)
  • A PLEA BARGAIN FOR NANCY AND PHILLIP GARRIDO?

    According to Nancy Garrido’s attorney, Nancy and her husband Phillip have given complete confessions. They are accused of the kidnapping and rape of Jaycee Dugard who was kidnapped as she waited for a school bus in front of her family’s South Lake Tahoe house when she was 11 years old and held in captivity along with her two daughters who were fathered by Phillip Garrido for 18 years.

    Apparently the confessions were given in anticipation of a plea bargain that would prevent a trial. Phillip Garrido is facing 440 years and Nancy is facing 241 years.

    It is hard to imagine what a plea bargain would look like: each of them will only spend 150 years in prison? Perhaps they will agree to a plea that keeps Phillip in prison for the rest of his life and gives Nancy some chance of getting out of prison before she dies of old age. Certainly no judge is going to agree to a plea bargain that lets Phillip ever get out of prison.

    Allowing the Garridos to give a confession prior to a plea agreement is a desperate move on their attorneys’ part. Once you give a confession you don’t have much choice but to plead guilty. The confession itself is admissible at trial. It is powerful evidence and it will not take much more evidence to convict. Since Jaycee and her daughters are expected to testify a conviction will be a foregone conclusion if the confession is entered into evidence.

    Phillip Garrido may attempt to convince a jury that he is not guilty by reason of insanity but he is unlikely to succeed. Among the many witnesses at the trial will be some of his customers at the print shop that he ran in Antioch, California. It is unlikely that anyone who is insane could run a successful print shop. Not only did he run a print shop but he managed to hide Jaycee for 18 years. That takes planning and preparation unlikely to be found in an insane man.

    Another trial issue that may come up is Jaycee’s testimony. There is some question of whether she will testify and if she testifies how she will testify. She has been quoted making statements friendly to the Garrido’s and she apparently met with Nancy in the jail in December. There is evidence that she was affected by the Stockholm Syndrome. The Stockholm Syndrome affects kidnapped individual who are totally dependent on their kidnappers. After initial feelings of anger and shock kidnap victims develop feelings of love towards their kidnappers who they are totally depended upon for emotional support, sustenance, and wellbeing. Thus with the Garridos facing outrageous sentences it is possible that Dugard will try to help them by providing favorable testimony. But the evidence of the kidnapping is extensive. Dugard’s step father witnessed it. She could testify that the sex was consensual but it will be hard for a jury to believe that Dugard who was 14 and totally dependent on her kidnappers for support when her oldest daughter was born gave knowing consent to the sex. Furthermore Dugard has given complete statements regarding her life with the Garridos to the police and she could be cross examined with her prior statements if she attempts to exonerate the Garridos.