<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Taking the Fifth &#187; Maira Guzman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://takingthefifth-acriminallawblog.com/tag/maira-guzman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://takingthefifth-acriminallawblog.com</link>
	<description>â€“A Criminal Law Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:14:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SEVENTH CIRCUIT REINSTATES CIVIL RIGHTS ACTION FOR IMPROPER EXECUTION OF A SEARCH WARRANT</title>
		<link>http://takingthefifth-acriminallawblog.com/2009/05/14/seventh-circuit-reinstates-civil-rights-action-for-improper-execution-of-a-search-warrant/</link>
		<comments>http://takingthefifth-acriminallawblog.com/2009/05/14/seventh-circuit-reinstates-civil-rights-action-for-improper-execution-of-a-search-warrant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 12:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zshapiro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[42 USC 1983]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Right action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Informants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search and seizure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search warrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maira Guzman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summary judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unus v Kane]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://takingthefifth-acriminallawblog.com/?p=1217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several days ago we discussed <em><a href="http://takingthefifth-acriminallawblog.com/2009/05/08/suing-for-fourth-amendment-violations/">Unus v. Kane</a></em>  a case in which a Muslim family sued for an alleged violation of its Fourth Amendment rights to be free of unreasonable searches and seizures.  Today we take a look at another case in which the plaintiff claimed an illegal search of her residence.  Luckily for the plaintiff in this case, Maira Guzman the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals <a href="http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/tmp/NH1FFUBF.pdf">reversed </a>the trial court grant of summary judgment to the defendant, the City of Chicago.   Guzman sued the City of Chicago pursuant to <a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/ts_search.pl?title=42&#038;sec=1983">42 USC Section 1983</a> for a violation of her civil rights.</p>
<p>Sergeant Marvin Bonnstetter of the Chicago Police Department was investigating gangs in Chicago.  While he was at the jail he was approached by a man who claimed to have information.  Together with an FBI officer he met with this man (known as John Doe). The officers asked the man a number of questions.  He seemed knowledgeable about Chicago gangs and he was able to identify pictures of gang members. </p>
<p>John Doe told the officers that he had seen a convicted felon, Ruben Estrada coming out of his residence,  located at 1536 West Walton in Chicago, with a gun.  Doe told the officers that the West Walton address was a single family residence.  The officers and Doe drove by the building and it appeared to be a single family residence.  There was a real estate sign in the window and the officers thought it was a home run business.</p>
<p>Bonnstetter used the information to write an affidavit and submit it to the court to get a search warrant for the residence.  A magistrate signed the search warrant.  </p>
<p>Fourteen police officers and FBI agents, including Bonnstetter went to the residence to serve the search warrant.  Shortly after arriving they discovered that it was not a single family residence.  The real estate office was separate from the rest of the building and their were two residential apartments in the building.  Furthermore no one by the name of Ruben Estrada lived in the building. They searched the upstairs apartment where Maira Guzmen, a pregnant woman, her husband, and their nine year old son lived.  </p>
<p>The Seventh Circuit found that while Bonnstetter acted appropriately in obtaining the search warrant the police did not properly execute the warrant.  The court citing <em><a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&#038;vol=480&#038;invol=79">Maryland v. Garrison</a></em> stated that since the officers realized that it was not a single family residence prior to the search, they were required to withdraw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://takingthefifth-acriminallawblog.com/2009/05/14/seventh-circuit-reinstates-civil-rights-action-for-improper-execution-of-a-search-warrant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

